Wednesday, November 30, 2011

RIP GamePro, 1989-2011

GamePro has meant many things to me over the years, and has become very much a part of my professional and personal life over the past couple, so today's news that both the print and online properties are being closed, and the staff laid off is particularly sad.

Back in 1998, when I first moved to the States to run Electronic Gaming Monthly, GamePro was "the enemy." This was pre-Internet dominance, pre-Game Informer surge, pre-blog, pre-YouTube, pre-anything else that people consume videogames content through these days. It was us-versus-them, and we thought they were a bit crap, honestly. I loved the people, but the mag wasn't for me. I don't mean to disrespect the memory, but coming from a different culture in the UK, I didn't have the emotional bond to the brand - so looking at it purely subjectively, and as its main competition, I just didn't like it very much. What I did have though, was a huge appreciation for how many gamers grew up with it (just like they did with EGM) and a massive respect for its place in the history of what I do for a living.

Little did I know that 12 years later I'd be running the thing. The whole situation came about almost entirely by accident. I'd just sold my own site, What They Play, to IGN and was "between jobs" and wondering what to do next. Some old co-workers from my time at Ziff Davis had recently made the move to IDG to run the GamePro business and reached out to me with a very compelling offer to do pretty much whatever I wanted with the GamePro brand both online and in print. What followed was a liberating 10 months of editorial and design experimentation that allowed the whole team to change the way people thought about the brand, and try some new ideas for games coverage. It was a lot of fun, and I'm incredibly thankful to everyone that made it possible.

Sadly, the business always had a sword of Damocles hanging over it; print. Its legacy was so entwined with physical production and distribution that transitioning the whole thing to a digital business was more complicated than you would expect. The print business in general is a mess. Distribution is expensive, production is expensive, and efficiencies are terrible. For every copy of a magazine that is sold these days, four, five or six are pulped. The wastage is incredible, and with the unit price of a printed magazine being roughly $1, it's an unbelievably difficult business to sustain. The audience just isn't as engaged as it was, and consequently advertisers aren't either. So there's a huge cost and a diminishing income. I believe the technical term is that it's "fucked." But I went into the whole thing with eyes wide open; I knew it wasn't a long term gig, and my assumption at the time was that we'd shift the emphasis from print to online, and allow the magazine itself to ultimately enjoy a dignified death while things flourished on the web. 

After I left GamePro to run GameSpot last year, my connection to the brand remained. I met some wonderful people in my time there, and they were a group I had grown extremely fond of. Also, with me out of the picture, my brother was free to step in and contribute to the content mix; which he did with considerable vigor. Under Julian Rignall (someone I've looked up to and respected since he ran Mean Machines back in the olden, olden, olden days of British games magazines when I was running MegaDrive Advanced Gaming) Pete made an enormous difference to the volume of content on GamePro's site, and to the breadth of their coverage.

Watching the comments about the news on Twitter, it's clear there are several themes emerging; the obvious respect and fondness for the team and what they were doing, a great sense of respectful nostalgia for something that had been around for so long, frustration that yet more games journalists are out of work, and questions as to why this is happening.

The glib answer is that media is a tough business, and audiences are fickle. Building a large-scale media business is expensive, audience needs are adapting constantly and people need information in new ways that aren't always easy to keep up with at a scale that can sustain the costs involved. It doesn't help that the competitive landscape has changed so much either. Magazines used to compete with each other and nothing else; EGM versus GamePro is a great case in point. Later, big websites went toe-to-toe (and still do) like GameSpot and IGN. These days though, because the way we consume media and information has changed so much (particularly for games) and the way we seek it out has evolved (Google, YouTube, etc.) the competitive landscape is far more complex. Gaming media brands compete with each other still, but they also compete with their own subjects; publisher's own social media presences, official websites, official communities, studio Facebook pages and YouTube channels; and they compete with their own audience tooparticularly on YouTube. Media across the board is having to adapt to citizen journalism in all forms, and in the games space the breadth of that covers everything from commentary to cool gameplay videos and walkthroughs. With so much information online, people aren't loyal to any media brands the way they used to be. People know what they want, so they just search for it...and if you don't rise to the top of Google's (or, increasingly, YouTube's) search results page - you're not going to get the audience, and audience equals revenue which pays the bills.

Talent remains though, and I'm sure that many of the folks affected by today's sad news will find other work. They're a great crew. I'll certainly be taking a long hard look at what we have opening up on GameSpot in the near future and considering who's now available. There's still a need for good, imaginative writing about games.


Jerry Bonner said...

Well said, JD. And in using the "sword of Damocles" reference above, I now have that damn song from Rocky Horror on my head...

Jerry Bonner said...

Should be "in" my head. Duh.

Colin said...

I actually subscribed to GamePro for the first time ever when you took over, JD. While I'd never been a fan of the magazine, I knew you'd do good things with it, and the upswing in quality from my first issue, which you'd had little to no influence on, to the next was remarkable. So I was sad to see you leave, and I don't think the magazine was as strong without your guidance. With the way they talked up the quarterly format, I had high hopes for deeper, more interesting pieces. But the collection of puffy items in the first (now only) quarterly issue disappointed me quite a bit. It seemed misguided to charge 10 dollars for something that light and forgettable. Too bad, because I love both print and games. When they're mashed together well, I'm a happy nerd. I've followed the work of enough of the final GamePro staff roster to know there were some great folks there. So I hate this news for their sake, and wish them all the best. But as callous as it may be to say, I won't miss the magazine GamePro had become in its final issue.

Will Herring said...

Very well said. It's been a good ride, John :)

Ross said...

Well said John. I was impressed by what you did with GamePro in the short time you were there. It's too bad that the information climate we live in ultimately sunk the product after you left.